It’s becoming more common for the program to suggest no changes. Since using Wordrake, my legal writing has improved over time. Would making some of these suggested changes improve the paragraph? I think so. Here’s an example of Wordrake’s suggestions for the excerpt from the Tennessee Supreme Court’s opinion in Cox v. I estimate I accept close to two-thirds of its suggestions. Wordrake will suggest changes for you to consider, and you can accept or reject each suggestion. Simply draft a document in Microsoft Word, and then use the Wordrake extension to “rake” the document. It was developed by a lawyer and is popular with lawyers. Wordrake is an automated proofreader that works as an extension in Microsoft Word to tighten, clarify, and improve the brevity of your writing. If you’re in Knoxville and don’t want to buy your own copy, you’re welcome to borrow mine. If you want to become a more effective advocate, this book is well worth your time. use numbered or bulleted lists where appropriate (like the one you’re reading).lead the reader to reach his/her own conclusions, and.avoid meaningless verbiage (like “Comes the Plaintiff, by and through counsel, and respectfully requests that.
It’s easy to read, and it has improved my writing. The 100 tips are conveyed in separate chapters, many of which are only 3-4 pages long. His most helpful work is The Winning Brief: 100 Tips for Persuasive Briefing in Trial and Appellate Courts (3d ed.). He is the editor-in-chief of Black’s Law Dictionary and co-authored two books with Justice Scalia. Bryan Garner is a law professor who has written over two dozen books about English usage, style, and legal advocacy. Here are some resources that have helped me become a more persuasive writer who gets better results. Judges rarely read their arguments carefully or in their entirety, and rarely do they persuade.įortunately, all of us can improve as writers. We all know lawyers whose letters read like streams of consciousness from a jumbled mind, whose pleadings are filled with page after page of irrelevant information, and whose briefs are nearly incomprehensible. I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but many family-law attorneys are not very good at writing. Letters, motions, memoranda of law, orders, appellate briefs - family-law attorneys write a lot. The constant drive to improve is one reason the best lawyers study caselaw - and one reason smart lawyers read this blog. Even after a positive outcome, we examine the case critically to observe things that, with the benefit of hindsight, we would have done differently. Despite our success, we are rarely satisfied. One common trait among the best family-law attorneys is that we are always looking to improve.
0 kommentar(er)
